After finishing the book I was left on kind of a cliff hanger. Although Landsman ends up solving the case after hard work and determination we see him in a spot where it seems like he has gained nothing from this whole experience. After all of the progress he has made throughout the book, it seems as if Landsman is constantly becoming more and more aware of this issue and his depression. I thought that by the end of the novel he would gain everything he had lost but nothing really ends up working out for him except finally talking to Bina about their whole situation. After all this time we find out that Landsman has been causing his own misery constantly beating himself up over the broken off marriage with him and Bina. The entire time he thought he did the right thing breaking up with her because he believed he failed her and he thought that she had wanted this. After all of this misery he had been putting himself through, mainly about this break up, it all end with him getting back with the girl. What is interesting thought is one of the last lines of the book is “Landsman has no home, no future, no fate but in Bina” (399). Thinking that after getting the girl, Landsman would finally take himself out of this depressing life he had been living and finally find his way in life and become this well off person with a successful re-marriage. With this line at the end it left me thinking that this whole journey Landsman had been going on understanding himself better only really led him to getting back the girl who he lost.
Revealing the end of the mystery ultimately ruins the book but the murderer is definitely not who I had expected it to be. Throughout the novel Chabon provides so many different clues and people it could virtually have been anyone. Although the mystery makes the book more suspenseful the whole ordeal with Landsman’s life and problems really make the reader get into the mind of Landsman and see his unfit way of living.
Overall I think it was an excellent book. The whole mystery combined with the religious aspect really made the book worthwhile and interesting. The entire book was very humorous and almost all of the people in the story had a defining personality that separated them from the rest. I really liked that fact that Chabon completely changed history in order to write this book. He looked at history from an alternate perspective and put the Jews in a tough situation as they always end up getting put in. I think that he wanted to show people what kind a community would have looked like after the war, had it been in America. I also liked the whole belief of Mendel Shpilman being this Messiah. It really dove in to a religious myth or legend that Judaism is all about. I think that by mixing religious belief and historical fact, with a little bit of mystery sprinkled in, Chabon ultimately achieves success in making this an entertaining, suspenseful, and worthwhile novel.
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Conclusion Analysis and Final Thoughts
Posted by jake at 8:06 PM 0 comments
Theme
The American Dream is a theme based on the idea that America is a land full of opportunities where everyone has the chance to recreate his or herself. In many instances the American Dream involves being rewarded for hard work and being able to prosper because of it. This Dream gives people a sense of hope and a sense of value in life that could possibly be fulfilled.
Abstractly enough this book related to the theme of the American Dream. Although it may not be the initial plot and issue of the book, there is definitely a sense of America giving these people opportunity. In this book in particular, the Jews had been a discriminated people and were on the verge of facing a complete genocide. The people in this novel were refugees after World War II and everywhere they turned to they had no place to go. Historically, the Jews were given the land of Israel to be there new home but in this alternate reality Chabon changes the situation. After having no place to go, these Jews were presented land as a safe-haven in a small portion of Sitka, Alaska. These Jews were given the opportunity to live a life in America and live the American Dream. They finally had the chance to live in a place where they would no longer be suppressed as they had been in the Holocaust. It allowed these people to be given a chance at restarting their lives after losing almost everything that had been important to them. When these Jews came to America they tended to stay together and form a strong Jewish community. Once the community had established their foundations in America they became a thriving and well off community living the life of the American Dream, recreating their lives and making them the best they could after such a catastrophe. Given this land the Jews formed their own little thriving community that allowed them to live the American Dream.
The Community is also a theme in the book where all of these Jews show a strong sense of family and community. Everyone knows everyone in this community and as many small Jewish communities everyone ends up knowing just about everything about each other. Many of Landsman’s memories as a child have been surrounded by the many people in this Jewish community. Because he ends up becoming lonely with the death of his father and sister, the tight knit Jewish community gives him a sense of being comforted although it may be in a dumpster hotel.
Posted by jake at 7:22 PM 0 comments
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Image Study

This picture is probably the most significant out of the whole novel. In the beginning of the novel, the death of “Emanuel Lasker”, who ends up actually being Mendel Shpilman, is seen as only a simple murder of this random guy. When Landsman investigates the crime scene he is presented with many different clues as to who this man was and how he had died. The chess board in the room, which seems to be a minor detail, ends up being one of the most significant clues leading Landsman to solving not only this case, but finding out a lot about his own self throughout the process.
This picture is very significant because although Sitka, Alaska is in fact the setting of the book, it plays a huge roll in plot of the novel. The novel takes place in 2007, but after World War II Sitka, rather than the realistic Israel, becomes the escape for the Jews after the Holocaust. Facing a conflict that involves these people finally converting to Alaskan culture or getting forced out of this place they had been “temporarily” living in for sixty years, this Alaskan Jewish community has nowhere left to go and has no idea what is in store ahead of them.

This picture basically represents the life that Landsman has been living for the past few years after his break up with his life. He is so mentally weak he basically shrivels up and lives in Hotel Zamenhof which is depicted as a cheap beaten down hotel. Throughout the novel Landsman keeps coming back to this decrepit place and living this life of solitude without caring at all about the quality of his life. This reoccurring image in the novel constantly reminds the reader how mentally and physically poor Landsman is to call this hotel his “home”.

Not only is chess one of the major symbols in the novel it is a reoccurring image that constantly plays in Landsman’s mind. After seeing the crime scene and analyzing the chess setup in the room he goes to chess clubs i.e. the Einstein Chess Club to talk to some of the locals to see if they knew anything about this man. When they eventually find out the real Identity of the victim, Mendel Shpilman, Landsman uncovers how much chess contributed to his life. Chess was basically what Shpliman lived and “died” for as he grew up as a chess prodigy. The image of chess seems to be one of the most important images contributing to the plot and mystery of the murder.
Posted by jake at 7:54 PM 0 comments
Character Study
Meyer Landsman
“Look at Landsman, one shirttail hanging out, snow-dusted porkpie knocked to the left, coat hooked to a thumb over his shoulder. His cheek needs the razor. He hasn’t had a drink of alcohol since nine thirty this morning. Standing in the chrome-and-tile desolation of the Polar-Shtern Kafeteria at nine o’ clock on a Friday night, in a snowstorm, he’s the loneliest Jew in the Sitka District.” (146)
Meyer Landsman has been depicted since the beginning of the novel as a workaholic detective with depression about his recently broken marriage, an alcoholic who is “married to his shot glass”, and he is constantly reminded and reflecting on the death of both his father and his sister who died a year earlier. When we first meet Meyer Landsman he is washed up in the cheap Hotel Zamenhof seen as having no value in his life, calling this decrepit place his home. With all of the problems he is facing he has good reason to feel the way he does. Despite all of these issues, Landsman uses this murder mystery case to cope with his issues, however, he deals with it under the supervision of his ex-wife Bina Gelbfish. We learn that Landsman had broken it off with her because he thought she should have an abortion to eliminate the baby they believed to have a chromosome deficiency. Every time he sees Bina now, this guilt always comes back to him and this ongoing complication with his ex-wife always irritates him. Throughout the novel there is a great deal of sarcasm portrayed by Landsman displayed in almost every conversation he ends up having. He likes to deal with his problems by making many things in his life a joke to him and to other people. He doesn't seem to have the same capability as other to cope with the multiple problems he is faced with. Although seen as a washed up detective, as the novel progresses, we see Landsman transform his personal identity to one which he believes has value and one worth living. The more Landsman finds out about the case the more and more he understands himself.
Mendel Shpilman
Introduced as Emanuel Lasker, the victim of a murder, Landsman goes out of his way to solve this mysterious case of his death. In the beginning of the novel, not much of his background could be determined until we are presented with the scene of his murder. In order to receive the information they need, Landsman manages to talk to his mother and father. When Landsman is confronting his father, the rebbe of the Verbover Chasidic Jewish community, about the murder, we find out that Mendel was disowned for an unknown reason by his father and he will not give any information about him. However when meeting with his mother, we get more information on who this man was. Mendel was apparently born, as the Chasidic Jews refer to it, as the Messiah. At a young age he had always been surprisingly intelligent and was seen as a chess prodigy. “He had the kind of mind that could hold and consider contradictory propositions without losing its balance” (121). As a child he was very energetic and playful, with an IQ of 170 and learning almost 5 languages by the time he was eight or nine. Everyone who knew him had a special connection with him and loved him dearly. He was not only this intelligent child, he was sweet and kind to everyone he met. Being seen as the Messiah he had been under a lot of pressure and ended up condoning to the use of heroin and became an addict. He seemed to become so obsessed with his addiction that it basically took over his life and his family had not seen him for twenty-five years. He gets so overwhelmed with his life that he does not even want to live anymore.
Berko Shemetz
Berko Shemetz is the Meyer Landsman’s trusty partner. Berko is introduced as the complete opposite of Landsman. He has a great family life, a loving wife, and he is satisfied with the job he has. “Unlike Landsman, Berko Shemets has not made a mess of his marriage or his personal life. Every night he sleeps in the arms of his excellent wife, whose love for him is merited, requited, and appreciated by her husband, a steadfast man who never gives her any cause for sorrow or alarm.” (6). Before being Landsman’s partner he lived in the Verbover community with his wife and small child. Once moving out of that community he becomes Landsman’s trust partner. Everything about Berko seems to always be much better than Landsman. Constantly sarcastically criticizing each other Berko always has Landsman’s back. Berko’s relationship with Landsman, however, seems to be a little more one-sided. He is the one who is supporting Landsman and Landsman takes a little bit advantage of him. No matter how one sided the relationship is, Berko and Landsman work well together and they both have each other’s back.
Bina Gelbfish
Bina Gelbfish is another one of the main character's in the novel. In the beginning she is only described as a part of Landsman's depression but we finally meet her and see who shes really is. Bina is the ex-wife of Landsman who has had similar difficulties in getting through this break up much as Landsman had. As she is introduced we see a very different personality than expected through all of Landsman's prior inquisitions. From all the grief that the author shows Landsman faces,there are not very many good qualities originally established. When coming back from a break she is put in the awkward position of being promoted to the position where she will be in charge of her ex-husband after working with him for so many years. "We're all aware of the awkwardness of the situation here. It could be weird enough that I just used to squad with you both. The fact that one of you used to be my husband, and the other one my, uh, cousin well, shit"(57). As Landsman becomes more involved in the case, the more and more we see the old chemistry that they had together. Bina becomes depicted as a very "in-charge" type of woman who wants things her way. She still seems to be pretty sensitive on the issue of her previous marriage much like Landsman is. Bina and Landsman had known each other for so long, they still have this feeling of comfort around each other. Finally, by the end Bina and Landsman seem to pick up where they left off and look towards the future.
Posted by jake at 6:46 PM 0 comments
Monday, December 7, 2009
Symbols
The game of chess is a big symbol reoccurring almost throughout the entire novel. In the very first scene when we the crime scene is investigated, Landsman pays particular attention to the chess board that seems to be set up in a very precise way.
“It looks like he had a game going on, a messy-looking middle game with Black’s king under attack at the center of the board and White having the advantage of a couple of pieces. It’s a cheap set, the board a square of card that folds down the middle, the pieces hollow, with plastic nubs where they were extruded.” (4)
The actually set up of the particular game that the man had been in seemed to have a big impact on Landsman. Because there wasn’t much else that was worthwhile looking at in the room this chess board seemed to be his biggest clue.
In the Jewish community, on the Sabbath, since work is not allowed to be done, the only game allowed to be played on this holy day is chess. In fact, almost everyone in this Sitka community seemed to be very familiar with chess. When talking to possible suspects most of them were associated with chess or new Mendel for his chess skills. In the novel chess is almost a way of life. When talking about the skills as a chess player it seems as if they are actually talking about their own character. At the end of the novel when the clues are starting to be put together we see the symbolism of the chess board in Mendel’s life. The particular board he had set up was set up in way where the Black side was forced into a move that ultimately led him to checkmate. The particular situation left the Black side with no good moves at all. This is how Mendel saw his own life. He saw that after all of this he basically has no other good move but to die.
Two other symbols that are present in the novel are the World’s Fair shot glass and his car. In the very beginning of the novel we are introduced to both of these symbols. The shot glass is introduced as “the shot glass that he is currently dating, a souvenir of the World’s Fair 1977” (2). Obviously Landsman is a blatant alcoholic but the shot glass only comes up in particular moments. Whenever Landsman is feeling the slightest bit depressed, he turns to this shot glass to ease the situation because he has no other way of coping with his issues. I think the shot glass basically represents this false life and an escape for Landsman. Every time we see him use the shot glass he is trying to get out of this life that he is living and get this false feeling of contentment when in reality he knows the life he is living should be better.
The 1971 Chevrolet Chevelle Super Sport seems to be another small symbol in the book. One quote can basically sum up how the car is basically symbolic of Landsman’s life.
“Landsman is at the wheel of a 1971 Chevrolet Chevelle Super Sport, which he bought ten years ago in an access of nostalgic optimism and has driven until all its secret flaws seem indistinguishable from his own. In the ’71 model year, the Chevelle went from two pair of headlight bulbs to a single pair. Right now one of these bulbs is blown” (35)
Just from this quote we can see the resemblance of the car and Landsman. The car is ultimately symbolic of the life that Landsman is living. He is a depressed alcoholic who often can’t get his mind out of the past. The car seems to be just as beat up as he is and it seems like there is no turning around for Landsman.
Posted by jake at 6:27 PM 0 comments
Monday, November 23, 2009
Personal Connection
So far I have really been able to connect to this book very well. The town that is set up in the novel of Sitka, Alaska is a Jewish community filled with many ideas and traditions that I can easily relate to. Just the way Chabon writes the novel is very informal and humorous and really chatches spot on to some traditional stereotypes of Jews. In the very beginning when talking about the murder scene, Landsman asks Tenenboym if he touched anything and he replies, “Only the cash and jewlry.” This is very humorous because this alludes to the stereotype of Jews being greedy for money and I can connect with it being Jewish. There are many parts in the novel that remind me of a lot of people in my family, but mainly I can connect to it because much of the humor that is used in the novel is based on either a Jewish stereotype, a tradition or a custom that other people might not be aware of. Because Chabon adds a little Yiddish twist to the text and describes many of the situations through the perspective of a Jew, it kind of already portrays how maybe i would act in situations the characters are put in. There are many remarks in the novel that would have gone over my head if it weren’t for my Jewish identity. These remarks are basically about Jewish customs or traditions that only a Jew would understand as well as understand the humor behind it. An example of this might be, "This conversation is the equivalent of Landsman's kissing the mezuzah, the kind of thing that starts out as a joke and ends up as a strap to hang on to." This remark is a metaphor used by Chabon to show humor through the Jewish custom of kissing the mezuzah (a small box that holds prayers which is placed on the doorposts of a Jewish persons home) as he or she walks in the door. Because so much of this novel is revolved around the Jewish culture it has been really easy for me to get into the book, and with the added murder mystery it makes this novel all the more worthwhile.
Posted by jake at 6:41 PM 0 comments
Rhetoric Study
Thus far Michael Chabon’s writing style has been a pleasure to read. He uses a good amount of humor through sarcasm and he uses Yiddish words to add to the humor of the novel as well. Many instances in the novel that seem to be pretty intense are actually lightened by a sarcastic remark by Landsman, or a description of someone or something using Yiddish slang. The first couple of character’s that are introduced all give off a sarcastic tone that makes this book very humorous. Not only do most of these character’s have sarcastic tones but each of them has very Jewish-sounding or Yiddish name like, Tenenboym, Shemets, Shpringer, Gelbfish, Velvel.
“’ I sleep,’ Landsman says. He picks up the shot glass that he is currently dating, a souvenir of the World’s Fair of 1977. ‘It’s just I do it in my underpants and shirt.”’(2)
This quote displays a good example of the sarcasm used by Landsman when he is simply questioned. I also found it very interesting the way Chabon goes to say that he is “currently dating” this shot glass, which made it seem like this had been his only lover or the only thing he has cared about in a while. His choice of diction to portray his attachment to this shot glass really gave me a since that he is an alcoholic who has possibly been depressed and this shot glass has been his escape.
“…in whose cafĂ© the great exiles of Jewish chess met every day to demolish one another without pity or heart…He took on all comers and sent them out of the Einstien so soundly thrashed that one or two of them never forgave him”(30)
This situation is a part in the novel when Landsman takes his father to this hotel to play chess against some people and to maybe get some information about the murder of this Emanuel Lasker. The way Chabon describes the way these old men play chess is very humorous. It could almost be compared to a fight between old people. By giving this sarcastic edge to the game of chess Chabon easily portrays a good sense of humor.
There aren’t exactly specific passages that point out the constant use of Yiddish words but Landsmen uses many Yiddish words in his everyday language like referring to his gun as a “sholem”. The main source of Yiddish comes from all of the names he gives to the people and places. All of these names and places adds to the humor of the novel giving it a very Jewish or Yiddish feel.
Posted by jake at 6:10 PM 0 comments
Snapshot!
As I was reading the first few pages of the novel I came to the actual scene of the crime that is described in great detail. I thought that it would be necessary to pay attention to all the small details that are mentioned because in mysteries sometimes the small clues end up being the big picture. Although this passage seemed to be very important to the book, it also stuck out a lot because the detail of the scene was so intense that it actually forced me to read closely and see if maybe even I noticed anything in the scene that was different. Because the situation and the plot is still developing it’s almost impossible to see any significant clues, but more or less they all could be significant.
In the beginning of the novel the crime scene of the mysterious murder of Emanuel Lasker is almost taken as a snapshot in the mind of Meyer Landsman. As the scene is describes in great detail, Landsman seems to take every bit of the scene in so he might understand what has happened a little better. I found it very interesting how detailed the crime scene was and how Landsman noticed every little detail that is odd about the situation. As the murder is depicted, so far the only thing I know as the reader is that this was definitely a murder set up as a suicide, and there is no sign as to who has done it. I think that this passage about the crime scene will end up being very important because most cases I usually hear of have to do with all of the clues found on the scene. Landsman notices little details that do not seem to be of any significance such as a chess board which seemed to be in the middle of a game, the arrangement of burnt out light bulbs, the window opened only an inch.
These small details might not seem like much but may be important in the end.
As I read further in the book this scene seems to be even more significant because Landsman keeps going back to the scene a progressively finding more clues that are probably more worthwhile that the ones he had originally found. In the following chapters Landsman approaches and investigates the scene again finding a couple of books inside the bedside table of the room and also a small black box called “tefillin” which usually has small parchment of Jewish scriptures and Lasker’s had none. The book that Landsman find are probably going to play an active part in the rest of the novel because he pays close attention to this book about chess because in his mind the set up chess board seemed to be of significance. One of the other detective finds this tefillin which is usually wrapped around the head and arms in a special pattern with a small box dangles from the part wrapped around the head. They figured out since nothing is in the box that wrappings were used to dilate the vein in his arm.
Every time Landsman goes back to the crime scene there is always something new that is found so I think that this scene from the very start of the novel will progressively become more and more important.
Posted by jake at 4:02 PM 0 comments
Interesting Character
Although it usually takes a couple of chapters to get a real view of the main character, Chabon makes it a point to establish much of Landsman’s character in the first chapter. Landsman is immediately depicted as a sarcastic detective who has been divorced from his wife and a blatant alcoholic.
“According to doctors, therapists, and his ex-wife, Landsman drinks to medicate himself, tuning the tubes of crystals of his moods with a crude hammer of hundred-proof plum brandy. “ (2)
This immediately establishes Landman’s alcoholic behavior and brings up his ex-wife. Although his ex-wife does not sound like a big deal, a little bit later on in the chapter Landsman calls up his partner Berko Shemets and Chabon includes the following description about Landsman, “Unlike Landsman, Berko Shemets has not made a mess of his marriage or his personal life. Every night he sleeps in the arms of his excellent wife, whose love for him is merited, requited, and appreciated by her husband, a steadfast man who never gives her any cause for sorrow or alarm.” (6). I think this description is very significant because Chabon makes it a point to show the clear cut contrast between Landsman and Shemets. Not only does Chabon contrast the two partners, but he goes to an almost extreme when talking about Shemets’ love for his wife which may mean that Shemets and Landsman are not just different but possibly polar opposites. Thus far, Shemets hasn’t really been described in detail so I am still unsure of how true that statement actually is.
Landsman’s character is still not fully developed but I think that his personal life and much of his character will have to do with the rest of the novel since the author makes a point to establish all of this information in the first couple of pages.
Posted by jake at 3:57 PM 0 comments
Introduction Analysis
Although this wasn’t exactly the book I had originally wanted, after starting to read the first couple pages I was immediately attached to the character and plot of the novel. The beginning of this book, The Yiddish Policemen's Union caught me by a pleasant surprise as seeing a significant event start off the novel. The author Michael Chabon immediately starts off the novel by illustrating a murder in the hotel he's been living in called Hotel Zamenhof. Without introducing any background information Chabon tries to immediately grab the reader's attention by introducing the murder of this resident. "Nine months Landsman's been flopping around at the Hotel Zamenhof without any of his fellow residents managing to get themselves murdered. Now, somebody has put a bullet in the brain of the occupant of 208, a yid who was calling himself Emanuel Lasker" (1). These are the first two sentences of the whole book. The author does not necessarily use many rhetorical devices but this is a very good strategy to instantly catch the reader’s attention and it instantly sets a mysterious and suspenseful tone. Not only is this attention-grabbing, but it immediately sets up the plot and what the rest of the book is going to be about. Usually an author will set up a situation before giving the reader a plot, but the first two sentences really grabbed my attention right away.
The rest of the introduction goes on to depict the type of character Meyer Landsman is and a little bit of background about his life. Although he seems like he is not too fond of his job, when he sees the room of this murder and the way it was set up, it took me by surprise. I got the feeling that Landsman knew something more about the murder or at least he seemed as if he was more intrigued by this scene than any others he had been involved with. Because the author sets up this introduction in such a mysterious and suspenseful way it made me curious as to the significance of this murder. I think that this murder will have a great impact on Landsman’s personal life and maybe through this crime something about himself will be revealed by the end of the novel.
Posted by jake at 3:56 PM 0 comments
http://www.gizmowatch.com/images/crime_scene_mgmt1_2405.gif